Browse Tag Archive for "Social Media"

Facebook Ups the Ad Game Ante

How Facebook is trying to siphon off TV ad spend

Brands Are Wasting Time And Money On Facebook And Twitter, Report Says

How Starbucks Crushes It on Social Media!

The Marketing Destination Has Changed As Ad Clicks Pointing Outside Of Facebook Are On The Rise

<p><a target='_blank' href=''><img src='' class='alignleft' style='width: 100%'/></a></p><p>The online marketing space is always in flux, and the last two years have seen a significant investment by brands to drive engagement inside many properties, including Facebook and YouTube. This influx of advertising money contributes significantly to the bottom line of these websites, especially Facebook, but marketing spends have a habit of moving around. Recent research from the <a href="" rel="nofollow">Jun Group</a> suggests the trend is moving away from engagement inside social networks and back towards brand owned digital properties.</p><p><br></p><p>The key findings of the research show that between them, Facebook and YouTube “accounted for a combined 69% of all actions taken after brand campaigns in 2012″, but the corresponding figure for the end of 2013 has seen that engagement drop to 30%. That engagement has to go somewhere and the percentage of brand messages pointing back to the brand’s own property has risen from 28% to 61% in the same period.</p><p><br></p><p>Mark Zuckerberg’s social network has been actively <a href="" rel="nofollow">pushing brands and marketers to see Facebook as a ‘paid for’ channel during 2014</a>, so this change is not happening in a vacuum.</p><p><br></p><p>Part of this can be put down to the maturing nature of social networks. Now the gold rush is over and brands are established players, marketing switches away from gathering likes and followers to directing these users back out of the social network maze towards the home pages and splash landing pages of the brands.</p><p><br></p><p>To continue reading, please visit the following link;</p><div></div><p>Source: <a target='_blank' href=''></a></p>

Is Bad Grammar Killing Your Brand?

<p><a target='_blank' href=''><img src='' class='alignleft' style='width: 100%'/></a></p><p>Everyone who has texted or spent even a tiny amount of time on popular social media sites knows how the internet has seemingly lowered the standards of spelling and grammar across the board. Random typos, acronyms, and memes prevail across platforms – and we are all constantly at the mercy of auto-correct regardless of how carefully we type.</p><p><br></p><p>With everyone from your boss to your grandparents using abbreviations such as “u” for “you” and “tmrw” for “tomorrow” and internet terms like lol and btw, it may seem like the internet, texting, and social media are changing the way we use language. And as some may be asking themselves, <a href="" rel="nofollow">has the internet killed grammar</a>?</p><p><br></p><p><b>“Internet Speak” And Its Impact On Digital Brand Management</b></p><p><br></p><p>For business owners, advertisers, and marketers, the effect of the internet on grammar and spelling reaches further than many expect. It goes beyond personal communications and being slightly irked at random typos and errors that one may come across while perusing the web; how a brand communicates and connects online is a reflection of the company itself, and that includes using certain types of languages on various social and digital platforms.</p><p><br></p><p>To continue reading, click the below link;</p><p>Source: <a target='_blank' href=''></a></p>

Twitter Analytics Could Turn Us Into Engagement Addicts

<p><a target='_blank' href=''><img src='' class='alignleft' style='width: 100%'/></a></p><p><span style="">I’m impressed by </span><a href="" style="" rel="nofollow">the new Twitter analytics dashboard</a><span style=""> but I’m also a little concerned about what it might do to the way we tweet.</span></p><p><span style=""><br></span></p><p>Among various charts and graphs, the dashboard – currently available to verified, and some unverified, users – gives a presumably accurate count for how many people have seen your tweets. Meanwhile, an ‘Engagement’ figure for each tweet counts clickthroughs to profile pages, clicks on hashtags, retweets, replies, link clicks and the like.</p><p><br></p><p>This is incredibly powerful data for social media marketers, but could we be spoiled by it as individual users?</p><p><br></p><p>I’ve bookmarked my analytics page and will no doubt check it regularly to see how I’m ‘performing’ but it’s data I might be better not knowing. I can imagine a near future where a lot of the human touch of Twitter is stripped away as users regularly check their stats, seeing what tweets are most popular and tweaking their ‘strategy’ to get more ‘engagement’ and reach a wider audience.</p><p><a href="" rel="nofollow"></a></p><p>Imagine the ‘<em>and-you’ll-never-believe-what-happened-next</em>-ization’ that has affected online publications in recent times spreading to stats-hungry individuals. “I’ve just eaten a sandwich” replaced by “I’ve just eaten a #sandwich. Here’s a picture of it. Tell me about your favorite sandwich!”</p><p><br></p><p>Think that scenario’s unlikely? I’ve already seen people share their total monthly tweet impression counts. It’s like video games – who doesn’t want to get a higher score? Sure, we’ve had retweet and Favorite counts for some time (and some people’s tweets are definitely influenced by those), but the new analytics take data about our personal Twitter accounts to a whole new level. Even if we don’t deliberately change the way we tweet, subconciously it could be a different story.</p><p><br></p><p>Continue reading the full story via the following link;</p><p>Source: <a target='_blank' href=''></a></p>

Brands Having Awesome Conversations on Twitter

Inside Facebook's Data-Science Team